“Afridi & Angell have a very qualified team who are well versed with the local laws and provide correct advice to their clients. They are very prompt and efficient and always well researched.” - Legal 500 EMEA

Potential criminal liability for arbitrators and experts

Afridi & Angell inBrief

By Haider K Afridi and Chatura Randeniya

Article 257 of the UAE Penal Code (Federal Law No. 3 of 1987) was recently amended by Federal Law No. 7 of 2016 to introduce the concept of criminal liability for arbitrators, experts, and translators who issue decisions and opinions ‘contrary to the duties of impartiality and honesty’. Article 257 as amended provides (in translation) as follows:


Whoever issues a decision, makes an opinion, files a report, presents a case or asserts a fact in favour of or against someone, contrary to the required duties of impartiality and honesty, in their capacity as arbitrators, experts, interpreters (translators) or fact finders appointed by the administrative or judicial authority or nominated by the parties shall be punished by temporary imprisonment. The above said categories shall be prohibited from taking up any new assignments and shall be subject to the provisions of Article (255) hereof.”


Article 255, referred to in Article 257, provides for reduced sentences in certain circumstances. An unofficial translation is set out below:


Shall be exempted from penalty:


  • The witness who, if he tells the truth, shall be subject to a severe prejudice in his freedom, honour or shall expose to such severe prejudice his spouse, even if divorced, one of his ascendants, descendants, brothers, sisters or in-laws of the same degrees.


  • The witness who reveals before the court his name, surname and nickname and who had not to be heard as a witness or if he has to be told that he has the right, if he wishes, to abstain from testifying.


  • In the two above instances, if such perjury exposes another person to legal prosecution or to a judgment, the author shall be sentenced to detention for a minimum term of six months.


Article 255 refers to witnesses and their testimony, and therefore appears more likely to be relevant to expert witnesses, and not arbitrators.


Article 257 prescribes a punishment of temporary imprisonment. Pursuant to Article 68 of the Penal Code, temporary imprisonment constitutes imprisonment of between 3 and 15 years.


The amendment became effective on 29 October 2016.


Prior to its amendment, Article 257 was confined to the criminal liability of experts appointed by the courts. Subsequent to the amendment, Article 257 has been expanded to apply to arbitrators and experts who are appointed by an administrative or judicial authority, or nominated by the parties. Ostensibly therefore, arbitrators and experts appointed in Dubai under institutional or ad hoc rules will be subject to Article 257.


It is yet to be seen how Article 257 will be interpreted and applied in practice. It would conceivably be a difficult task to establish that an arbitrator or an expert has failed to act in an honest and impartial manner. However, the prospect looms where parties dissatisfied with the outcome of an arbitration will pursue complaints under Article 257, and this prospect is one that potential arbitrators will now have to take into account when accepting appointments. ■

Download inBrief as PDF