Author: afridi-angell

DIFC Workplace Savings Scheme (with effect from 1 February 2020)

On 14 January 2020, the Employment Law Amendment Law (DIFC Law 4 of 2020) and the Employment Regulations (the Amendment) were enacted. The Amendment introduces a new mandatory workplace savings scheme, which replaces the current end-of-service gratuity regime. The new scheme commences on 1 February 2020.

 

Effect of the Amendment 

 

The main consequence of the Amendment is that:

 

  • End-of-service gratuity benefits (EOSB) of employees will accrue until 31 January 2020 then stop accruing thereafter.
  • From 1 February 2020, employers must make monthly mandatory contributions into a professionally managed and regulated savings plan (Qualifying Scheme) for the benefit of their employees.

 

The monthly mandatory contributions into the Qualifying Scheme must be at least:

 

  • 5.83 percent of the employee’s basic salary for the first five years of service; and
  • 8.33 percent of the employee’s basic salary for each additional year of service,

 

provided that the basic salary is not less than 50 percent of the employee’s total monthly compensation.

 

 

Who Does This Apply To? 

 

DIFC-based employers and employees (with the exceptions listed below). This includes employees under a DIFC visa that are seconded outside of the DIFC.

 

The Qualifying Scheme does not apply to DIFC-based:

 

a) employees registered with the GPSSA (typically, UAE and GCC nationals);

b) employees of the DIFC Authority, or other local or federal government entities;

c) employees seconded to a DIFC entity from other regions;

d) entities that are exempted from the application of DIFC Law 2 of 2019 (the Employment Law) by the President of the DIFC;

e) employees serving a notice period on 1 February 2020;

f) employees under a fixed term contract expiring on or before 1 May 2020; and

g) equity partners of DIFC entities.

 

DEWS Plan

 

The default Qualifying Scheme is the DIFC Employee Workplace Savings (DEWS) Plan.

 

Employers wishing to enroll in an alternative Qualifying Scheme must apply for and obtain a Certificate of Compliance from the DIFC Authority.

 

Voluntary Contributions

 

An employee can make monthly voluntary contributions to the Qualifying Scheme by written request to their employer. Their employer will then deduct the agreed amount from the employee’s total monthly compensation and transfer the same into the Qualifying Scheme each month.

 

Employee’s Entitlement under the Amendment 

 

At termination of employment (End Date), the employee shall be paid:

 

  • their EOSB accrued until 31 January 2020 (see comments in the section below); and
  • all the mandatory contributions from 1 February 2020 to the End Date,

unless the employee opts to defer receipt of the above to a later date.

 

End of Service Benefits

 

Employees can choose to transfer their existing EOSB to a Qualifying Scheme. This choice would change the amount they receive at their End Date.

 

Fines

 

Employers that fail to make the monthly mandatory contributions, do not transfer EOSB to a Qualifying Scheme as per the employee’s request, or do not have a Certificate of Compliance (if enrolled in an alternative Qualifying Scheme) shall be subject to a maximum fine of USD 2,000 per contravention for each employee.

 

Any agreements between the employer and employee against participating in a Qualifying Scheme or to pay contributions less than the amount stipulated above shall be null, void and unenforceable.

 

Immediate Administrative Tasks for DIFC Entities

 

DIFC entities should be mindful of their immediate administrative tasks now applicable as a result of the Amendment, which include:

 

  • appointing a DEWS Plan signatory through their DIFC portal;
  • having in place an internal system to calculate each of their employees’ contributions and ensure that monthly contributions are made on time;
  • obtaining written consent of employees as to whether to transfer their EOSB to a Qualifying Scheme or not;
  • registering with the DEWS Plan or applying for a Certificate of Compliance, if they wish to enroll in an alternative Qualifying Scheme;
  • enrolling current, eligible employees to a Qualifying Scheme by 31 March 2020, and new, eligible employees before the expiry of two months following their respective employment date.
  • informing their eligible employees of their rights under the applicable Qualifying Scheme; and
  • making monthly contributions (both mandatory and, if applicable, voluntary) of employees as per the rules of the applicable Qualifying Scheme. ■

Slightly more clarity: Economic Substance Regulations in the DIFC

The DIFC has provided slightly more clarity as to how UAE Cabinet Decision 31 of 2019 (the Economic Substance Regulations, or ESR) will apply within Dubai’s financial free zone. Helpful as the guidance is, significant questions remain.

 

The DIFC held a presentation on 17 December to discuss the Economic Substance Regulations. The first point of note was that all businesses in the DIFC must file an ESR notification by 31 March 2020. The content of this notification is set out in the Economic Substance Regulations themselves. There are three components to the notification.

 

1. The business must declare whether or not it is engaged in one of the nine “Related Activities” set out in the Economic Substance Regulations;

 

2. If it does conduct one of the Related Activities, the business must indicate whether any of its income from such activity is subject to any sort of tax outside of the UAE; and

 

3. The dates of the business’s financial year.

 

The notification requirement will apply to financial service providers regulated by the DFSA, and also to all other non-regulated businesses, including DIFC branches of businesses that may be making similar notifications outside of the DIFC. Any entity registered with the DIFC’s Registrar of Companies will need to file these notifications. The format of the notification has yet to be decided, but it was suggested that the UAE’s Ministry of Finance (being the “Competent Authority” pursuant to the Economic Substance Regulations) will be standardizing the forms for ESR notifications and reports.

 

The second point of note is the DIFC’s Registrar of Companies will be the “Regulatory Authority” in the DIFC. Expectations (based on the wording of Cabinet Decision 58 of 2019) were that the DFSA would be the Regulatory Authority in the DIFC. There was a suggestion that the Registrar of Companies may delegate some of its responsibilities to the DFSA, but for the time being it appears that the Registrar will fulfill this important role. (It is the Regulatory Authority which decides if a business has met the economic substance requirements, and if not, reports the business to the Ministry of Finance.)

 

The DIFC made it very clear in their presentation that they would be adopting a “substance over form” approach when considering whether a business was conducting one or more of the Related Activities. This was a welcome clarification, as some market commentators had been suggesting that businesses would only be caught by the Economic Substance Regulations if their commercial license specifically mentioned one (or more) of the nine Related Activities.

 

The presentation ended with a Q&A session. This revealed that significant areas of uncertainty and concern remain. Of particular concern to businesses in the DIFC was whether all financial service providers would be considered to be undertaking a Related Activity. There was a suggestion that the DIFC and the DFSA would jointly host a further presentation in the new year to answer some of those questions.

 

Practical next steps

 

All businesses in the DIFC should diarise 31 March 2020 and note their obligation to file a notification with the Registrar of Companies by that date. In order to make that notification they will need to determine if they are undertaking a Related Activity. If they are undertaking a Related Activity, and deriving income from it, they will then need to file an ESR report. The ESR report must demonstrate that they meet the economic substance thresholds. Failure to meet these thresholds may result in significant fines and/or suspension of licenses. Any business with concerns about meeting such thresholds will have several months to take remedial action, as most businesses conducting a Related Activity in the DIFC will have until the end of 2020 before they need to make their first ESR report. Afridi & Angell is able to advise clients on the Economic Substance Regulations, although general uncertainty remains regarding the approach the Registrar of Companies will take when considering (a) the scope of the specific Related Activities and (b) what needs to be done to meet the economic substance thresholds. ■

The use of experts in the UAE Municipal Courts: Seven things you need to know

1. There is a high possibility that you will have to present your case to an expert: Although the appointment of experts is more likely in disputes involving technical issues (e.g. maritime disputes, construction disputes, etc.), it is increasingly common for the UAE courts to refer disputes which, on the face of it do not require expert assistance, to experts. The courts have the power to do so in terms of Article 69 of the Federal Evidence Law (No. 10 of 1992 as amended) which provides that a court may delegate to one or more experts when necessary. Article 69 does not set out any criteria to be satisfied in exercising this power. The most frequent appointment is of accounting experts.

 

2. It is likely to be a pivotal stage of litigation: In the clear majority of cases, the courts adopt the conclusions of the expert, even though the expert’s report is not binding on the court. However, Article 90(2) of the Federal Evidence Law provides that if the court issues a judgment which contradicts the findings of the expert, the court must state the reasons why it disagrees with the expert’s findings. It is therefore important to ensure that your case is properly pleaded and understood by the expert.

 

3. You may object, on certain limited grounds, to the appointment of a person as an expert: A party may object to an expert if there is a reason to believe that he/she cannot perform his/her duties impartially, if he/she is related by blood or by law to one of the parties up to the fourth degree, is a proxy to one of them in his/her personal affairs, a guardian or tutor or working for one of the parties, or if he/she or his/her spouse is in actual litigation with one of the parties in the case or with his/her spouse. An objection must be filed within a week of the order appointing the expert.

 

4. Experts have wide discretion to carry out their functions: The order appointing an expert will set out a mandate for the expert, and will vest the expert with the authority and powers required to carry out his tasks, e.g. to visit the premises of the parties, examine documents, and hear witnesses without administering an oath to them. Parties can take the opportunity to ask the expert to require their opponents to produce certain documents, which is useful as document production in the courts is very limited.

 

5. You have an uphill task ahead of you if the expert does not give you a favourable report, but all is not lost: The parties are given an opportunity to comment on the expert’s report before the court issues judgment. A party may also request the court to refer the matter to a different expert, or a panel of experts, or an expert at the Ruler’s Court, although such requests are rarely granted. The court, on its own initiative or upon request of a party, may order the expert to be present in court to be questioned, although such orders are also rare.  Pursuant to Court Circular 4/2018 issued by the Dubai courts, parties are permitted to submit reports prepared by an expert for consideration by the judge. The privately appointed expert must be accredited by the courts, and his report should not criticize the court-appointed expert’s report (even though there may be disagreement regarding the findings).

 

6. An expert could be criminally liable if he provides a report that he knows to be false, or gives a false interpretation of facts: Article 257 of the UAE Penal Code (Federal Law No. 3 of 1987 as amended) provides for a sentence of imprisonment between one and five years. In practice however these are difficult allegations to prove.

 

7. An expert’s report may assist a party to obtain provisional relief: The UAE courts have the power to grant provisional relief pursuant to applications made without notice to the defendant. Such relief is sought primarily under the provisions of Article 252 of the UAE Civil Procedure Code or the Federal Maritime law. These discretionary orders are granted on the basis of documentary evidence filed by the applicant, and having a report from an expert accredited by the court can sometimes improve the odds of obtaining an order from the court. ■

Off-Plan Construction Delays: Options for Resolution in Dubai

By and large the Dubai offplan real estate market is well regulated and developers complete construction by the “anticipated completion date” as set out in the Sale and Purchase Agreement, albeit often subject to the contractual right to extend such date for a further 12 months. In addition, purchasers can take comfort that the Real Estate Registration Agency (RERA) actively monitors the progress of construction works for each off-plan project in Dubai, and in most cases a copy of RERA’s audit report can be obtained from the Dubai Land Department’s website.

 

However,  amid  a  sluggish  real  estate  market  and  global  economy,  there  have  been  instances  of construction delays of some off-plan projects as developers face cash flow issues.

 

It is important that purchasers are aware of their rights in order to address these challenges in the event that they find themselves facing such delays.

 

In this inBrief we discuss the ramifications under law of such delays, and what a purchaser can do in the event a dispute.

 

The Law

 

A purchaser may apply to court to terminate the contractual relationship between the purchaser and the developer in the circumstances set out in Article 20 of Executive Council Resolution 6 of 2010. In the context of construction delays, the relevant circumstances are as follows: “any other cases that may require termination of the agreement in accordance with general principles of law.”

 

In addition, the Article 246 of the Civil Code requires that: “(1) The contract must be performed in accordance with its contents, and in a manner consistent with the requirements of good faith. (2) The contract shall not be restricted to an obligation upon the contracting party to do that which is expressly contained in it, but shall also embrace that which is appurtenant to it by virtue of the law, custom, and the nature of the disposition.”

 

Practically,  a  purchaser  should  attempt  to  resolve such  dispute  with a  developer  amicably  by lodging a complaint with RERA, failing which the purchaser can consider bringing court or arbitration proceedings (as the case may be) to enforce its rights.

 

Dispute resolution: Court, Arbitration

 

RERA:  In the event a purchaser experiences construction delays, a complaint can be lodged with RERA. It is important to make RERA aware of any construction delays as, pursuant to Article 23 of Executive Council Resolution 6 of 2010, RERA has the power to cancel a project in cases of serious delay, including: “if it is proven to RERA that the developer has no intention of implementing the project” or “if the developer fails to implement the project due to gross negligence”.

 

Where a project is cancelled by RERA, the developer must refund all payments received from the purchaser pursuant to the procedures and provisions stipulated in Law 8 of 2007.

 

Arbitration:  In the event of construction delays and if filing a complaint with RERA does not render results then the purchaser should look to the dispute resolution mechanism in the SPA, which is most commonly arbitration.

 

However,  a  purchaser  will  need  to  seek  legal  advice  as  to  the  strength  of  its  arbitration  claim, particularly as the SPA will often permit the developer to extend the “anticipated completion date” for a further 12 months, or excuse certain construction delays as events of force majeure.

 

Arbitration is beneficial as it is usually faster than court; it is private; and specialist arbitrators can be used to accurately determine a matter. In Dubai the most popular arbitration venues are before the Dubai Chamber of Commerce  and  Industry  (DIAC)  or  the  Dubai  International  Financial  Centre/London  Court  of International Arbitration (DIFC/LCIA) Centre.

 

Court:  If there is no arbitration clause contained in the SPA, then the purchaser must file its case with the Dubai courts. Again, a purchaser will need to seek legal advice as to the strength of the claim.

 

Proceedings are started by filing a claim in the relevant court office on payment of the required court fee. On application by the claimant, payment of court fees can be deferred in exceptional cases. The court fee depends on the value of the claim, and in Dubai has a maximum cap of AED 40,000. This fee is payable either on an application for provisional relief, or on filing the main lawsuit.

 

The claim must meet procedural requirements, include the names and addresses of the parties to the action, and include details of the claim. Documents in support of the claim are usually annexed to the claim and must be translated into Arabic. The court issues a summons with a hearing date endorsed on it for service on the defendant, with a copy of the claim and any supporting documents filed by the claimant.

 

Once an answer has been filed, the trial is adjourned for the claimant to respond. Further adjournments are given so that memoranda can be filed by the parties. Once the court believes that the case has been sufficiently pleaded, it reserves the matter for judgment. The entire proceeding is based on written submissions supported by documentary evidence. The court usually appoints an expert to assist it and usually accepts the expert’s report.

 

Conclusion

 

Further instances of construction delays with respect to some off-plan projects are likely to occur as developers face increasing cash flow issues amid a sluggish real estate market and global economy. Purchasers should be more aware than ever of their legal rights, potential remedies and developers’ responsibilities. ■

Regulatory Authorities to Regulate Relevant Activities in Accordance with Economic Substance Regulations Announced

Further to our previous inBrief dated 7 July 2019, which discussed UAE Cabinet Resolution 31 of 2019 Concerning Economic Substance Regulations (the UAE Economic Substance Regulations or the Regulations), and inBrief dated 10 October 2019, which discussed the Guidance on UAE Economic Substance Regulations issued by the UAE Ministry of Finance, Cabinet Decision No. 58 of 2019 has now designated the regulatory authorities (the Regulatory Authorities) to regulate compliance with the UAE Economic Substance Regulations.

 

Background

 

Under the Regulations, a Licensee engaged in any one of the nine Relevant Activities listed therein must meet an Economic Substance Test in relation to each Relevant Activity carried on by such Licensee. This includes but is not limited to demonstrating that its State Core Income-Generating Activities are carried out in the UAE.

 

The Regulations contemplated that a yet-to-be designated Regulatory Authority (the Regulatory Authority under the Regulations is different from the Competent Authority) would regulate compliance with the Regulations. The Regulations read as if there would be a single Regulatory Authority for the entire UAE; however, the Guidance on Economic Substance Regulations, in certain places, contemplated the possibility of more than one Regulatory Authority.

 

Cabinet Decision No. 58 of 2019 has appointed a number of different authorities as the Regulatory Authority, depending on the nine Relevant Activities and where these Relevant Activities are undertaken.

 

The concerned Regulatory Authorities are as follows:

 

Relevant Activity           Regulatory Authority  
 

Banking Activities

  

– UAE Central Bank for banking activities regulated by the Bank.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for banking activities exercised in the latter.

 
 

Insurance Business

  

– Insurance Authority for the insurance business regulated by the Insurance Authority.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the insurance activities exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the insurance activities exercised in the latter.

 
 

Investment Funds Management

  

– Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) for the investment funds management regulated by the SCA.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the activities of investment funds management exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the activities of investment funds management exercised in the latter.

 
 

Financial Leasing Activities

  

– UAE Central Bank for the financial leasing activities regulated by the bank.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the financial leasing activities exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the financial leasing activities exercised in the latter.

 
 

Headquarters Activities

  

– Ministry of Economy for the headquarters’ works and activities regulated by the Ministry.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the headquarters activities exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the headquarters activities exercised in the latter.

 
 

Shipping Activities

  

– Ministry of Economy for the shipping activities regulated by the Ministry.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the shipping activities exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the shipping activities exercised in the latter.

 
 

Holding Company Activities

  

– Ministry of Economy for the holding company activities regulated by the Ministry.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the holding company activities exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the holding company activities exercised in the latter.

 
 

Intellectual Property Activities

  

– Ministry of Economy for the intellectual property activities regulated by the Ministry.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the intellectual property activities exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the intellectual property activities exercised in the latter.

 
 

Distribution and Services Centres

  

– Ministry of Economy for the distribution and services centres activities regulated by the Ministry.
– Competent authority in the Free Zone for the distribution and services centres activities exercised in the latter.
– Competent authority in the Financial Free Zone for the distribution and services centres activities exercised in the latter.

Going Forward

 

The appointment of the Regulatory Authorities means that businesses licensed in the UAE should fast track an assessment to determine if they are subject to the UAE Economic Substance Regulations. It remains to be seen what approach such Regulatory Authorities will take in enforcing the UAE Economic Substance Regulations. ■

Emirates Development Bank Appointed to Maintain Register of Finance Leases

Introduction

 

Pursuant to UAE Federal Cabinet Resolution No. 56 of 2019, Emirates Development Bank has been appointed to maintain the register of finance lease contracts created pursuant to UAE Federal Law No. 8 of 2018 on Finance Lease (the Finance Lease Law or the Law).

 

Background

 

The Finance Lease Law was promulgated in December 2018. This Law creates a register (the Register) pursuant to which “Finance Lease Contracts” shall be registered. A Finance Lease is defined in the Law as:  “A relationship whereby the Lessor acquires Leased Property for leasing purposes and, under a separate contract, leases such property to the Lessee for a specific period in accordance with the provisions hereof and offers the Lessee the option to own the Leased Property pursuant to the provisions hereof.” 1

 

Leased Property under the Law includes both personal and real property.2

 

In order for a lease to constitute a Finance Lease within the meaning of the Law it must include a rent-to-own option. A lease without an option to purchase would not fall within the scope of the Law. Whether intended or not, this requirement will have the practical effect of excluding a considerable number of leasing arrangements commonly practiced in the UAE from the scope of the Law. Also, whether intended or not, the Law will apply to Ijarah contracts used in Islamic financing whereby the purchase of property is facilitated by the lender purchasing the property and leasing it back to the customer on a lease-to-own basis.

 

The appointment of Emirates Development Bank to maintain the Register is a logical choice given that Emirates Development Bank already maintains the Emirates Movables Collateral Registry (EMCR) established pursuant to Federal Law No. 20 of 2016 on the Mortgage of Movable Property to Secure Debt.

 

UAE Federal Cabinet Resolution No. 56 of 2019 was published in the UAE Federal Gazette in August of 2019. As of the date of this inBrief, registration is not yet possible. Emirates Development Bank has not made public the timetable for launching the Register but this is expected in the near future.

 

Compliance Requirements and Further Legislation

 

The Finance Lease Law states that the Central Bank shall enact licensing regulations governing licensing the practice of Finance Lease activity in the UAE and may further license branches of foreign finance lease companies.3  The Central Bank has not yet issued such regulations. Guidance from the Central Bank in this regard is critical given that (i) Article 2(1) of the Law stipulates that Finance Lease activity may not be practiced in the UAE unless and until the Lessor has obtained a license to that effect from the Central Bank and (ii) Article 2(2) states that any Finance Lease concluded with a person unlicensed by the Central Bank shall be deemed null and void. Similarly, Article 3 of the Law stipulates that a Finance Lease contract must be registered in the Register, otherwise such contract shall be deemed null and void. The deadline for complying with the licensing and registration requirements under the Law is 31 December 2019.4

 

Given the draconian consequences of non-compliance, and in light of the fact that (i) the compliance deadline is approximately 10 weeks away, (ii) the Register has not yet been launched, and (iii) the Central Bank has not issued the licensing regulations contemplated by the Law, the question arises as to whether extensions will be granted. This remains to be seen. Other, somewhat less critical, legislation is also pending.

 

The Law contemplates Special Accounting Standards relating to Finance Leases to be created by resolution of the Minister of Finance, which resolution has not yet been issued.

 

Article 35 of the Law specifies a fine not exceeding AED 500,000 for violations of the Law but further contemplates that the Cabinet will issue a resolution specifying the amount of the fine prescribed for each violation. Cabinet Resolution No. 56 of 2019 did not address this issue. Accordingly, a further Cabinet resolution specifying the amount of such fines is awaited.

 

Article 37 of the Law contemplates a resolution of the Minister of Justice designating certain employees as judicial officers and vesting them with the authority to establish whatever is done in contravention of the Law. Such resolution has not yet been issued.

 

Conclusion

 

The appointment of Emirates Development Bank to maintain the Register is a positive development in the implementation of the Finance Lease Law. Further legislation contemplated by the Law is eagerly awaited by all parties affected by the Law, as is the launch of the Register. This includes finance lease companies that will need to obtain licenses from the Central Bank and lessors that are required to register existing Finance Lease Contracts by 31 December 2019. ■

 

*****
1 See Article 1 of the Finance Lease Law.
2 The Finance Lease Law defines Leased Property as: “Each personal or real property which is useful to the usufructuary and is subject of the Finance Lease, inter alia, the on-plan subdivided real estate units that may be subject of legal dispositions in accordance with the provisions of legislation in force.”
3 See Article 2(4) of the Finance Lease Law.
4 The Finance Lease Law was published in the Official Gazette on 31 December 2018 and came into effect the following day. Article 38 of the Law provides for (i) a one year grace period from the effective date of the Law for companies practicing Finance Leasing to obtain a license from the Central Bank and (ii) a one year grace period for Lessors to register Finance Leases in the Register.

EU Removes UAE from Tax Blacklist

The European Union (EU) has removed the UAE from the EU’s blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.

 

The EU Blacklist

 

The EU maintains a blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. The EU has published criteria on tax transparency, fair taxation and implementation of anti-BEPS measures that EU Member States undertake to promote.1  BEPS refers to domestic tax base erosion and profit shifting due to multinational enterprises exploiting gaps and mismatches between different countries’ tax systems. Under the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS, over 130 countries are collaborating to put an end to tax avoidance strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to avoid paying tax. The EU has been active in trying to combat such tax avoidance not just in the EU itself but internationally and the blacklist is a key pillar of such efforts.

 

Brief History

 

Several jurisdictions that were either on the EU blacklist or at risk of being blacklisted responded by introducing legislation requiring entities established in such jurisdictions to demonstrate economic substance in the jurisdiction of establishment. The UAE had committed to enact legislation of this nature by 31 December 2018 but did not meet this deadline. On 12 March 2019, the EU placed the UAE on the blacklist.

 

In an apparent response to the UAE being blacklisted, the UAE Cabinet issued Cabinet Resolution 31 of 2019 Concerning Economic Substance Regulations (the UAE Economic Substance Regulations or the Regulations) which came into effect on 30 April 2019. On 11 September 2019, pursuant to Article 6(6) of the Regulations, the UAE Ministry of Finance issued Guidance2  on the Regulations.

 

The EU updates the blacklist periodically and on 10 October 2019 an EU press release announced that the UAE has been removed the blacklist.

 

Going Forward

 

The EU Code of Conduct Group monitors compliance with the EU’s criteria so the UAE’s removal from the blacklist is not necessarily the end of the story. A detailed discussion of the UAE Economic Substance Regulations is beyond the scope of this Legal Alert (for more information on these Regulations see Afridi & Angell’s inBrief articles dated 7 July 2019 and 10 October 2019). However, one issue to highlight is that the Regulations contemplate a further UAE Cabinet Resolution designating a Regulatory Authority3  to regulate compliance with the Regulations. The Regulatory Authority has not yet been designated. As such, the regulatory regime under which the Regulations will be enforced is not yet complete.

 

The appointment of the Regulatory Authority and the approach such Regulatory Authority will take in enforcing the UAE Economic Substance Regulations is a future development that warrants monitoring by any businesses that are potentially subject to the Regulations. ■

 

*****
1 See Council of the European Union, Outcome of Proceedings dated 5 December 2017. The Criteria on tax transparency, fair taxation and implementation of anti-BEPS measures that EU Member States undertake to promote are set out in Annex V thereto.
2 Ministerial Decision No. 215 of 2019 on the Issuance of Directives for the Implementation of the Provisions of Cabinet Decision No. 31 of 2019 Concerning Economic Substance Requirements.
3 The Guidance issued by the Ministry of Finance on 11 September 2019 raises the possibility that there could be more than one Regulatory Authority.

UAE Ministry of Finance issues guidance on Economic Substance Regulations

A previous inBrief dated 7 July 2019 discussed UAE Cabinet Resolution 31 of 2019 Concerning Economic Substance Regulations (the UAE Economic Substance Regulations or the Regulations).

 

The UAE Economic Substance Regulations designated the UAE Ministry of Finance as the Competent Authority. One of the responsibilities assigned to the Competent Authority under the Regulations is the issuance of guidance on how the Economic Substance Test (as defined in the Regulations and discussed below) may be met for the purposes of complying with the Regulations. The Ministry of Finance issued such guidance (the Guidance)1 on 11 September 2019.

 

Article 2.2 of the Guidance explains that the Regulations were issued pursuant to the global standard set by the OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP), which requires companies to have substantial activities in a jurisdiction and also taking into account the standards developed by the European Union (EU), specifically the code of conduct developed by the EU Code of Conduct Group (a group responsible for the EU’s taxation policy).

 

Economic Substance Test

 

Under the Regulations, a Licensee (as defined below) engaged in a Relevant Activity (see the nine activities listed in bullet points below) must meet an Economic Substance Test in relation to each Relevant Activity carried on by such Licensee. This includes but is not limited to demonstrating that its State Core Income-Generating Activities are carried out in the UAE. The activities that constitute State Core Income-Generating Activities vary for each of the nine Relevant Activities to which the Regulations apply. Such Relevant Activities are:

 

  • Banking Businesses
  • Insurance Businesses
  • Investment Fund Management
  • Lease-Finance Businesses
  • Headquarters Businesses
  • Shipping Businesses
  • Holding Company Businesses
  • Intellectual Property Businesses
  • Distribution and Service Center Businesses

This inBrief highlights thirteen topics covered in the Guidance that may be of interest to businesses affected by the UAE Economic Substance Regulations.

 

1. More than one Regulatory Authority?

 

The Regulations contemplate that a yet-to-be designated Regulatory Authority (the Regulatory Authority under the Regulations is different from the Competent Authority) will regulate compliance with the Regulations. The Regulations read as if there will be a single Regulatory Authority for the entire UAE. However, the Guidance, in certain places, contemplates the possibility of more than one Regulatory Authority which raises the question as to whether the Regulatory Authority may be different in each Emirate?

 

A Cabinet Resolution appointing the Regulatory Authority (or Authorities) is awaited. For stylistic purposes, the remainder of this inBrief will assume a single Regulatory Authority.

 

2. Clarification regarding definition of Licensee

 

The Regulations apply to Licensees. Article 1 of the Regulations defines a Licensee as “any natural or juridical person licensed by the competent licensing authorit/(ies) in the UAE, to carry out a Relevant Activity in the UAE including a Free Zone and a Financial Free Zone.” The Guidance clarifies that every Licensee “that carries on a Relevant Activity and derives an income therefrom in the UAE, including a Free Zone or a Financial Free Zone must meet the Economic Substance Test.” This implies that a Licensee that does not derive any income from a Relevant Activity carried out in the UAE would not be required to meet the Economic Substance Test.

 

3. Majority-owned government owned companies exempt

 

Under Article 3(2) of the Regulations, the Regulations do not apply to any commercial company (as defined in Article 1 of the UAE Commercial Companies Law2) in which the UAE Federal Government, the Government of any Emirate, or any governmental authority or body of any of them has any direct or indirect ownership in its share capital. By contrast, Article 3.2 of the Guidance states that the Regulations do not apply to any commercial company with at least 51% direct or indirect governmental ownership. An EU document indicates that the change to the 51% threshold was made to accommodate concerns of the EU Code of Conduct Group that exempting companies with any government ownership created a risk of circumvention of the substance requirements.

 

4. Filing requirements commence with effect from 1 January 2020

 

Under Article 8(1) of the Regulations, a Licensee shall notify the Regulatory Authority annually of the following:

 

“(a) Whether or not it is carrying on a Relevant Activity.

 

 (b) If the Licensee is carrying on a Relevant Activity, whether or not all or any part of the Licensee’s gross income in relation to the Relevant Activity is subject to tax in a jurisdiction outside of the State; in all cases such Licensee shall provide the Regulatory Authority with all information and documentation   required to be submitted by it pursuant to this Resolution or any further guidance or decision issued pursuant to this Resolution.

 

 (c) The date of the end of its Financial Year.”

 

Under Article 8(2) of the Regulations, the foregoing annual filing shall be made at the time specified by the Regulatory Authority and in the manner approved by the Regulatory Authority. As noted above, the Regulatory Authority has not yet been identified. However, Article 4.2 of the Guidance clarifies that such filing must be made with effect from 1 January 2020. This suggests the Competent Authority believes (or assumes) that the Regulatory Authority will be appointed before 1 January 2020.

 

5. List of core activities in the Regulations is not exhaustive

 

The Regulations require a Licensee to demonstrate that it conducts its State Core Income-Generating Activities in the UAE. Article 5 of the Regulations identifies, for each Relevant Activity, certain activities that must be carried out in the UAE.

 

Article 4.3(a) of the Guidance explains that the list set out in Article 5 of the Regulations “is not exhaustive” and that the list “includes the activities listed but is not limited to them.” The Guidance further explains that the general principle is that the activities listed in Article 5 of the Regulations “are regarded to be the most important activities that a Licensee carrying out a Relevant Activity is expected to be carrying on in the UAE.”

 

6. Directed and managed in the UAE

 

One of the requirements of meeting the Economic Substance Test, under Article 6(2)(b) of the Regulations,  is that a Licensee must be directed and managed in the UAE in relation to its Relevant Activity. Article 4.3(b) of the Guidance explains that the aim is to ensure that there are an adequate number of board meetings held and attended in the UAE. Article 4.3(b) of the Guidance further explains that:

 

“A determination as to whether an adequate number of meetings are held and attended in the UAE will be dependent on the level of Relevant Activity being carried out by a Licensee. It is expected that it must be at least one (1) meeting held in a Financial Year in the UAE. Consideration must also be given to meeting requirements prescribed under the applicable law regulating the Licensee or as may be stipulated in the constitutional documents of the Licensee.”

 

Additional requirements highlighted in Article 4.3(b) of the Guidance include:

 

  • meetings shall be recorded in written minutes and signed by attendees and such minutes are kept in the UAE;
  • quorum for such meetings shall be met and those attendees are physically present in the UAE;
  • directors shall have the necessary knowledge and expertise to discharge their duties; and
  • the minutes of board meetings must refer to all the relevant decisions taken and must be signed by directors physically present.

7. Meaning of “adequate” and “appropriate”

 

The Regulations use the undefined term “adequate” in several places. For example, “adequate number of qualified full-time employees”, “adequate level of expenditure”. In addition, the Guidance uses the terms “adequate” and “appropriate” several times. Article 4.3(g) of the Guidance explains that businesses vary in size and therefor the employees, expenditures and premises which are adequate or appropriate for a large or medium sized business may not be adequate or appropriate for a small business and that the Regulations are not intended to impose requirements to engage employees or incur expenditures beyond what is actually required by a business.

 

What is adequate or appropriate for each Licensee will be dependent on the nature and level of Relevant Activity being carried out by such Licensee. But a Licensee should maintain sufficient records to demonstrate the adequacy and appropriateness of the resources utilized and the expenditures incurred.

 

Article 4.3(g) also explains that the requirement for adequate employees is aimed at ensuring that employees carrying out a Relevant Activity are suitably qualified to do so.

 

8. Outsourcing

 

The Regulations permit the use of the third party service providers to satisfy certain requirements of the Economic Substance Test. Article 4.3(h) of the Guidance explains certain criteria that the third party service providers must meet including, by way of example, having adequate activities, employees, expenditures and premises in the UAE. Article 4.3(h) of the Guidance contains further elaboration and explanation of requirements for outsourcing that is not discussed herein but may be of interest to businesses subject to the Regulations who use third party service providers.

 

Article 4.3(h)5 of the Guidance explains that a Licensee who uses a third party service provider must demonstrate to the Regulatory Authority that outsourcing is not being done with the objective of circumventing compliance with the Economic Substance Test. This is perhaps one topic on which the Guidance may have created more potential confusion than clarification. It is not clear under what circumstances outsourcing would be deemed to be circumventing compliance.

 

9. Holding company business

 

Under Article 6(4) of the Regulations, a Holding Company Business that derives its income solely from dividends and capital gains is subject to reduced substance requirements. Such Licensee must satisfy only two criteria:

 

  • compliance with requirements to submit any documents, records or information to the relevant Regulatory Authority; and
  • maintaining adequate employees and holding and managing for the Holding Company Business.

Article 5.1 of the Guidance explains that Holding Company Businesses that undertake a Relevant Activity and derive income from such activity other than solely receiving income from equity interests do not benefit from this exemption and must meet the full substance requirements of the Economic Substance Test. The Guidance further explains that:

 

“A Licensee which owns other forms of assets (e.g. bonds, government securities, interest in real property) will clearly not be a ‘pure equity holding’ entity (even if it also owns equity participations) and will not be treated as carrying on holding business.”3

 

Moreover:

 

“Because it is possible for a Licensee to carry on more than one Relevant Activity, the fact that the Licensee is a ‘pure equity holding entity’ does not preclude the possibility that it may carry on one or more other relevant activities, in which case the CIGA [Core Income Generating Activities] shall be those associated with the income generated.”

 

10. Headquarters business

 

Article 5.2 of the Guidance explains that whether an entity carries on a headquarters business for the purposes of the Regulations is entirely dependent on the services it provides to other group companies and is not dependent on its position in the group structure.

 

11. High risk intellectual property activity

 

The Regulations identify certain activities relating to Intellectual Property Business as high risk and set out additional conditions that a Licensee carrying out such activities must satisfy. Article 5(3) of the Guidance explains that because income derived from intellectual property assets activity poses a greater risk of artificial profit shifting as compared to income from non-IP related activity, there is a presumption under the Regulations that a Licensee who carries out such activities is not complying with the Economic Substance Test. The burden is placed on the Licensee to rebut this presumption by providing sufficient evidence “demonstrating that the Licensee does and historically has exercised a high degree of control over the development, exploitation, maintenance, enhancement and protection of the Intellectual Property Asset by an adequate number of full-time employees, with the necessary qualifications, who permanently reside and perform their activities in the UAE.”

 

12. Businesses should retain records for at least six years

 

Under Article 7(1) of the Regulations, the Regulatory Authority may make a determination that a Licensee has not met the Economic Substance Test no later than six (6) years from the end of the Financial Year to which the determination relates. Article 4.4 of the Guidance explains that while the Regulations do not prescribe a set period for the retention of information by a Licensee, it is advisable to retain information relevant to evidencing compliance for a period of at least six (6) years.

 

13. Disclosure to overseas regulators

 

Article 9 of the Regulations addresses the exchange of information with foreign regulators. Article 9(3) states:

 

“Upon receipt by the Competent Authority of notification containing information that a Licensee has not met the Economic Substance Test for a Financial Year from a Regulatory Authority pursuant to the above Clause 2, the Competent Authority shall, pursuant to an international agreement, treaty or similar international arrangement to which the State is a party, provide the information relating to such Licensee to – 

 

(a) the Foreign Competent Authority of the country or territory in which resides the parent company, the ultimate parent company, and the Ultimate Beneficial Owner of the Licensee. 

 

(b) If the Licensee is incorporated outside the State, the Foreign Competent Authority of the country or territory in which the Licensee is incorporated.”

 

Article 6.4 of the Guidance explains that the Competent Authority shall provide information to the Foreign Competent Authority:

 

  • if a Licensee fails to meet the requirements under the Regulations for a specific Financial Year; or

 

  • the Licensee carries out a High Risk IP business.

 

UAE removed from European Union Tax Blacklist

 

The UAE Economic Substance Regulations were enacted after the UAE had been put on EU’s blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. On 10 October 2019, the EU issued a press release announcing that the UAE has been removed the blacklist. This topic is covered in more detail in Afridi & Angell’s Legal Alert dated 10 October 2019.

 

Next steps

 

All businesses in the UAE should make an assessment as to whether they are subject to UAE Economic Substance Regulations and those that are subject to the Regulations should begin initiating steps to ensure compliance with the Regulations. While the Regulatory Authority has not yet been appointed, the Guidance states that reporting requirements will commence on 1 January 2020 so it is anticipated that the Regulatory Authority will be appointed before year end. It would be prudent to start taking steps to comply with the Regulations as soon as possible. ■

 

_____________________________

1 Ministerial Decision No. 215 of 2019 on the Issuance of Directives for the Implementation of the Provisions of Cabinet Decision No. 31 of 2019 Concerning Economic Substance Requirements.

 

2 UAE Federal Law No. 2 of 2015, as amended.

 

3 The phrase “will not be treated as carrying on holding business” is potentially confusing. Read in the context of the entirety of Article 5.1 of the Guidance, we interpret this to mean that a Licensee owning other forms of assets such as bonds, securities, etc., would not be able to qualify for the reduced substance requirement under Article 6(4) of the Regulations. We do not interpret this phrase to mean ownership of other assets would automatically result in a company not being a holding company.