This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of employment and labour law in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It will cover termination of employment, procedures, protection for workers, compensation as well as insight and opinion on the most common difficulties employers face and any upcoming legal changes planned.
This Q&A is part of the global guide to Employment & Labour
The Federal Law No.20 of 2016 introduces a whole new regime for registering a security interest movable assets in the UAE.
This is a general guide to certain laws applicable to doing business in Iran. The information contained in this publication is given by way of general reference only, is not intended to provide legal advice, and is not to be relied upon in any factual situation as it does not cover all laws or regulations that may be applicable in all circumstances. No responsibility will be accepted by the authors or publishers for any inaccuracy or omission or statement that might prove to be misleading. You are advised to seek your own professional advice before proceeding to invest or do business in Iran.
Changes to the UAE Penal Code (Federal Law No. 3 of 1987) (the “Penal Code”) at the end of 2016 have (i) extended the current bribery provisions to include bribery involving a foreign public official or an official of an international organisation, (ii) increased the penalties for committing a bribery-related offence and (iii) criminalised the offering of a bribe in the private sector.
General Overview of Anti-Corruption Regulation
Since 1987, the Penal Code has contained prohibitions against bribery, making it an offence to bribe a public official in consideration for an act on the part of that official. A bribe could be anything of value. Offering or promising a bribe was also prohibited, as was the solicitation or acceptance of a bribe on the part of a public official. A public official could be an employee of the government or a person tasked with an official duty. An offence would be committed even if the official’s act was not part of his or her official duties, and even if the official did not actually intend to commit the act. In December 2005, the solicitation or acceptance of a bribe on the part of an employee in the private sector was also prohibited.
Changes to the Penal Code
The recent amendments to the Penal Code have brought anti-corruption regulation in the UAE more in line with other jurisdictions by the inclusion of “foreign public officials”.
Foreign public official is defined as “any person in a legislative, executive, administrative or judicial position [in] another country, whether permanently or temporarily, be elected or appointed, and whether with or without pay and any person entrusted with a public service”.
Both individuals and companies can be found to be liable for bribery of a foreign public official, as the relevant provisions of the Penal Code apply to anyone (whether a natural or legal body).
Crucially, the Penal Code provisions also now apply outside the territory of the UAE to any person who commits any of the bribery offences set out in the Penal Code, if the criminal or victim is a UAE citizen or if the crime is committed by an employee of the public or private sector of the UAE or if it involves public property. (Public property is defined as “(i) property that is fully or partially owned by any of the federal or local authorities, federal or local public establishments or institutions or companies owned, either wholly or partially, by the federal Government, local governments, societies and associations of public welfare and (ii) any property that is subject to the management or supervision of any of the entities set forth in paragraph (i) or of which it has the right to use or exploit”).
In addition, bribery involving an official of an international organisation has been prohibited.
Finally, the prohibition against bribery in the private sector has been expanded. Previously, the offence of private sector bribery was limited to the solicitation or acceptance of a bribe by a private sector individual. Now, it is also a criminal offence to offer a bribe to a person working in the private sector.
Consequence of Committing an Offence
There are various punishments for committing an offence under the bribery provisions, as follows:
• Imprisonment for any public official, foreign public official or official of an international organisation who demands or accepts a bribe. This now means that the relevant bribery provisions apply to non-UAE nationals and entities engaging in acts of bribery.
• Up to five years imprisonment for (i) anyone who offers a bribe to a public official, a private sector manager, a foreign public official or an employee of an international organisation and (ii) any person that has acted as a mediator between the briber and the receiver.
• A fine equal to the amount of the bribe (but which shall not be less than AED 5,000) for any of the above offences.
• Any gifts accepted or offered as a bribe will be confiscated.
The briber or mediator can be exempt from the above punishments if he informs the relevant judicial or administrative authorities of the crime, but only so long as he does so before the crime is discovered.
There is no time restriction on a civil or criminal lawsuit being taken against any individual or company having been found to have committed bribery offences.
Conclusion
The changes to the bribery provisions of the Penal Code are a significant change to anti-corruption regulation in the UAE. The Penal Code is now more wide ranging than before, extending to foreign as well as domestic bribery, and covering the public sector, international organisations and the private sector. ■
Overview
The new Pledge Law of the UAE was enacted on 12 December 2016 as Federal Law No. 20 of 2016. The Pledge Law was published in the Federal Official Gazette on 15 December 2016 and will become effective on 15 March 2017. The Pledge Law introduces a new regime for registering a pledge over movable assets which are pledged as security for the repayment of a debt. Whilst the Pledge Law provides some helpful guidance on the type of movable asset pledges that can be registered and the effects of registration, the key administrative details regarding the administration of the pledge register, including the entity that will establish and operate the register, the format of the pledge contract that will be registered and the registration procedure and fees will be outlined in the Executive Resolutions to the Pledge Law; which will be issued by the UAE Cabinet within 6 months of the effective date of the Pledge Law (the “Executive Regulations”). The most significant development under the Pledge Law is that it is no longer necessary for a lender to take possession of movable assets in order to perfect a pledge over the same. This means that a lender is no longer required to appoint an employee/representative of the pledger, as its agent, in order to take possession of any pledged movable assets.
Certain Key Features
Application of the Pledge Law
The Pledge Law applies to all civil and commercial transactions that create a right of pledge over movable assets in accordance with the provisions of the Pledge Law. The Pledge Law includes a broad category of pledge assets that can be registered, including bank accounts, commercial paper, tangible and intangible assets (previously intangible assets could only be pledged under a commercial mortgage for LLCs and would require a UAE licensed bank to act as the mortgagee), raw material and fungible assets and future assets (which was not previously possible as this would create a floating charge, which was not recognised under UAE law).
However, the Pledge Law does not apply to movable assets that can only be pledged by possession or where UAE laws require an interest over such assets to be registered under a specific register (e.g. vessels, cars, planes and shares of an LLC). Furthermore, it is not possible to register a pledge over certain categories of assets including (i) assets relating to home or personal use, unless they have been pledged as security for financing the purchase of the same, (ii) proceeds under an insurance policy, unless such proceeds relate to a pledged asset (iii) public, foreign consulates or endowment properties, (iv) rights resulting from future inheritance and (v) assets which require possession or specific registration, in order to perfect a pledge over the same.
How to Create a Right of Pledge
In order to register a pledge, the parties must (i) conclude a pledge contract, including details of the pledged asset, declaration from the pledgor confirming his right to pledge the pledged asset and the nature of the secured debt and (ii) notify the holder of the pledged asset (if not held by the pledgor). The pledge shall be registered by filing the necessary registration form with the registrar. All persons that should be notified of the pledge registration under the provisions of the Pledge Law (e.g. third party holders of the pledged asset), must be notified of the pledge registration at the time of the application. The pledge registrar and registration fees / charges (which will be paid by the pledgor, unless agreed otherwise by the parties) will be specified in the Executive Resolutions.
Once the pledge is registered the legal rights of the pledgee shall be effective against third parties. The pledgee shall be entitled to track and inspect the pledged asset (even if it is held by a third party), have priority over any income generated from the pledged asset and benefit from other priorities that are specific to certain types of pledged assets. For example, any registered pledge over a movable asset that is attached to real property shall have priority over any pledges relating to the real property, provided that the pledged movable asset can be removed without damaging the real property. The pledge rights over the movable asset attached to real property must also be registered in the relevant real estate register.
Enforcement
If the pledgor fails to perform its obligations under the pledge contract then the pledgee may (following prior written notice to the pledgor or obligor (as applicable)) request the sale of the pledged asset at market value within 10 working days, provided that certain conditions are met including (i) the parties agreeing to proceed with the sale without resorting to the courts, (ii) there are no outstanding third party rights over the pledged asset, (iii) notice of the enforcement to the person holding the pledge asset and owner of the real property (in the event that the pledged asset is connected to real property). In the case of pledged accounts the sums in the pledge account may be set-off by the account bank against sums owed to the pledgee (in the case that the pledgee is also the account bank) or the amount in the pledged account can be claimed from the account bank.
Alternatively, the pledgee may apply to the UAE courts for a summary judgement to exercise his rights over the pledged asset. This may involve placing the pledged asset into the hands of a third party in order to affect the sale of the pledged asset. The summary proceedings judge shall notify all relevant parties of the application, who may lodge an objection to the court. If the court permits the summary judgement application it shall permit the pledgee to either (i) take possession of the pledged asset and sell the same at market value or (ii) attach additional conditions for the sale of the pledged asset. The pledgee must register the decision of the court in the pledge register before selling the pledged asset. The pledgee must deposit the sale proceeds, from the sale of the pledged asset, into the treasury of the court, in accordance with the sale procedure set out under the Executive Resolutions.
The sale proceeds shall be distributed in accordance with the directions of the court, taking into account the rights of any other parties over the pledged asset. However, generally the sale proceeds shall be distributed in the following order of priority:
(a) any expenses relating to repairing, the sale, licensing or maintenance of the pledged asset;
(b) charges and fees relating to the enforcement of the pledge, including judicial fees;
(c) to the pledgees, in accordance with the priority determined by the court; and
(d) any surplus to be distributed in accordance with the laws of the relevant emirate.
Any remainder of the purchase price shall be distributed to the pledgor. If the sale proceeds are insufficient to discharge the debt secured by the pledge, the pledgor shall remain liable for the remaining unpaid debt. Enforcement and sale of the pledged asset will not be possible if the pledgor is subject to any preventative composition, bankruptcy or equivalent procedures under the Federal Decree Law No. 9 of 2016.
Termination of Pledge
A registered pledge may be terminated if (i) the pledgee and pledgor or obligor (as applicable) agree to strike-off the registration, (ii) the obligor discharges the obligations that are secured by the registered pledge, (iii) the registration relates to assets that cannot be pledged under the Pledge Law, (iv) the pledgee fails to discharge its obligations following the registration of the pledge contract, or (v) a court order is issued to strike-off the pledge registration.
Conclusion
Whilst the Pledge Law provides a valuable opportunity for lenders to perfect their rights through registration, the popularity of the new regime will depend largely on the administrative registration mechanisms that will be outlined in the Executive Resolutions. Nonetheless, the concept of the pledges register is another step (along with the introduction of the share pledge register under the new UAE Companies Law) towards providing greater certainty and protection for lenders. ■
Overview
The new Bankruptcy Law of the UAE was enacted on September 20, 2016 as Decree-Law No. 9 of 2016. It was published in the Federal Official Gazette on September 29, 2016, giving it an effective date of December 31, 2016. The new Bankruptcy Law replaces and repeals the previous legislation on the subject, Book 5 of the Commercial Code, which was seldom used in light of its perceived shortcomings. Perhaps the most important new feature of the new Law is the introduction of a regime that allows for protection and reorganization of distressed businesses.
Certain key features
Who does the New Bankruptcy Law apply to?
Article 2 of the new Bankruptcy Law provides that it shall apply to:
These are significant changes. Civil companies were generally viewed as falling outside the previous law, since they engaged in “civil” as opposed to “commercial” activities. But in contrast, the public sector is now almost completely exempt from the new Bankruptcy Law, unless and until a public sector company undertakes the amendment of its founding statute or constitutive and governing documents so as to make it subject to the new Bankruptcy Law. Coverage did not change as regards sole to proprietorships; traders who were engaged in business as sole proprietorships were subject to the previous law (although this was not generally appreciated) and are subject to the new Bankruptcy Law.
Some Key Features of the New Bankruptcy Law
The Financial Restructuring Committee
Article 4 provides that the Financial Restructuring Committee will be responsible for:
Debtor-creditor agreement – preventive composition
Rather than having to proceed directly (or at all) to bankruptcy proceedings, preventive composition will afford the debtor the opportunity to reach an agreement with its creditors for the repayment of sums owed (Article 5), while under court protection from individual creditor claims. This option will be available to the debtor only if it has not been in default for more than 30 consecutive business days and is not insolvent (Article 6(2)). The debtor will not be able to dispose of any property, stocks or shares, make any borrowings, or (if a company) change ownership or corporate form (Article 31(1)) whilst it is undergoing this process.
Application
The application must include, among other things, a description of the debtor’s economic and financial position; details of its movable and immovable properties, employees and creditors; and cash flow and profit and loss projections for the 12 months following the date of application (Article 9).
Debtor obligations
The debtor must continue to perform its obligations under any contract, provided the Court has not issued a judgment of stay of execution due to the debtor’s failure to perform its obligations (Article 34(1)). The trustee designated to facilitate the preventive composition process does have the right to request the Court to rescind any contract if that is in the best interests of the debtor and its creditors and provided that it does not substantially harm the other contracting party’s interests (Article 34(2)).
Appointment and obligations of the trustee
The Court will appoint one to three trustees as designated by the debtor or appoint an expert or other person (if more appropriate) (Article 17(1) and (2)).
The trustee will be obliged to publish in two daily local newspapers (i) a summary of the decision approving the preventive composition, with a request that all creditors file appropriate claims (Article 35(1)), (ii) a list of the debts and statement of accounts accepted from each of those debts (Article 37(2)), (iii) the invitation to creditors to discuss and vote on the draft preventive composition arrangement (“Arrangement”) (Article 42(3)) and (iv) once approved by the Court, the decision and summary of the Arrangement (Article 54). Ultimately, the Court will approve the final list of approved creditors, having reviewed any objections received following the publication of the debts (Article 38(1) and (8)).
The trustee will submit the draft Arrangement to the Court, who will then have five business days to make its decision to approve or reject it (taking account of any creditor objections) (Article 49(1) and (2)).
Thereafter, the trustee is responsible for supervision of the Arrangement throughout the implementation period (as described below), including submission of quarterly reports to the Court detailing progress and/or any failures by the debtor to implement the Arrangement (Article 55(1) and (2)). The trustee can apply to the Court for any amendments to be made to the Arrangement if it considers it necessary at any point during the implementation period (Article 55(3)).
Implementation
The preventive composition arrangement must be implemented within three years of the date of Court approval (Article 41). This term can be extended for a further three year period if a two thirds majority of the unpaid creditors consent to the extension (Article 41).
Discharge of the Arrangement
Following a request by the trustee, and pending discharge of the debtor’s obligations under the Arrangement, the Court will issue its decision confirming that the Arrangement has been entirely fulfilled. Such decision will be published in two daily newspapers, although the Law is silent as to which party is responsible for such publication (Article 56).
Conversion from preventive composition into bankruptcy procedures
At the request of an interested party, or in exercise of its own discretion, the Court may, under Article 65, initiate the termination of the Arrangement and convert it into a bankruptcy proceeding if:
Creditor-initiated bankruptcy
Under the old regime, a creditor could initiate bankruptcy proceedings against a debtor for any amount owing (provided such creditor could provide evidence that the debtor had ceased to make payments when they fell due). Now, there is a minimum threshold of AED 100,000 before a creditor (or group of creditors) can initiate bankruptcy proceedings against the debtor, provided that such creditor has adequately notified the debtor of such debt and the debtor has still failed to repay it within 30 consecutive business days of notification (Article 69(1)). How disputed amounts will be treated by the court is not addressed.
This more debtor-friendly position can be contrasted with other jurisdictions. For example, the Insolvency Act 1986 (which applies in England, Wales and Scotland) provides for a minimum debt exceeding just £750 (approximately AED 3,400) before a creditor is able to raise insolvency proceedings against a company debtor and apply to the Court to have the company wound up.
Removal of criminal offence
Under previous law, the UAE Penal Code treated bankruptcy as a potentially criminal act, even if not accomplished by fraud. The new Law abolishes the criminal provisions relating to non-fraudulent bankruptcy, eliminating the perceived stigma under the prior law. Despite this, it is important to note that the new Law in many circumstances still provides for criminal liability of entities and persons involved in a case of bankruptcy, and the existence of these provisions may continue to give owners, directors and management significant cause for concern.
Suspension of criminal proceedings relating to “bounced” cheques
Provided the debtor has given a cheque as payment before an application for a preventive composition or restructuring arrangement has occurred, any resultant criminal proceedings will be suspended pending the outcome of those arrangements and the recipient of such a cheque will be considered to be a creditor under the relevant arrangement (Article 212(1) and (2)).
Ability to raise new finance
While undergoing the preventive composition or restructuring process, a debtor (or the trustee) has the option to apply to the Court for authority to obtain new funding (Article 181). Any “new” creditor will have precedence over any ordinary outstanding debt owed by the debtor (but providing protections for existing creditors) (Article 181(1)).
Conclusion
While the new Bankruptcy Law favours debtors by giving them greater flexibility and protections in the event of insolvency, it will be interesting to see how the Law is implemented in practice and whether debtors make use of its provisions. Nevertheless, the introduction of an insolvency regime which offers protection and encourages restructuring to enable troubled businesses to survive what would otherwise have been a bankruptcy situation is welcome, and is a milestone development in the UAE’s business law landscape. ■
Article 257 of the UAE Penal Code (Federal Law No. 3 of 1987) was recently amended by Federal Law No. 7 of 2016 to introduce the concept of criminal liability for arbitrators, experts, and translators who issue decisions and opinions ‘contrary to the duties of impartiality and honesty’. Article 257 as amended provides (in translation) as follows:
“Whoever issues a decision, makes an opinion, files a report, presents a case or asserts a fact in favour of or against someone, contrary to the required duties of impartiality and honesty, in their capacity as arbitrators, experts, interpreters (translators) or fact finders appointed by the administrative or judicial authority or nominated by the parties shall be punished by temporary imprisonment. The above said categories shall be prohibited from taking up any new assignments and shall be subject to the provisions of Article (255) hereof.”
Article 255, referred to in Article 257, provides for reduced sentences in certain circumstances. An unofficial translation is set out below:
“Shall be exempted from penalty:
Article 255 refers to witnesses and their testimony, and therefore appears more likely to be relevant to expert witnesses, and not arbitrators.
Article 257 prescribes a punishment of temporary imprisonment. Pursuant to Article 68 of the Penal Code, temporary imprisonment constitutes imprisonment of between 3 and 15 years.
The amendment became effective on 29 October 2016.
Prior to its amendment, Article 257 was confined to the criminal liability of experts appointed by the courts. Subsequent to the amendment, Article 257 has been expanded to apply to arbitrators and experts who are appointed by an administrative or judicial authority, or nominated by the parties. Ostensibly therefore, arbitrators and experts appointed in Dubai under institutional or ad hoc rules will be subject to Article 257.
It is yet to be seen how Article 257 will be interpreted and applied in practice. It would conceivably be a difficult task to establish that an arbitrator or an expert has failed to act in an honest and impartial manner. However, the prospect looms where parties dissatisfied with the outcome of an arbitration will pursue complaints under Article 257, and this prospect is one that potential arbitrators will now have to take into account when accepting appointments. ■
In an earlier inBrief dated 9 December 2014 we wrote about Federal Law No. 4/2012 on the regulation of competition (the “Competition Law”), which introduced the means by which the United Arab Emirates could regulate anti-competitive practices. The Competition Law comprises three key elements: a restriction on anti-competitive agreements, restrictions as to the behaviours of entities holding dominant market positions, and a requirement that mergers between entities with a sufficiently large combined market share obtain clearance in advance from the Ministry of Economy (the “Ministry”).
Although the Competition Law took effect on 23 February 2013, it has had minimal impact as it provided insufficient detail to enable compliance or enforcement.In particular, the Competition Law failed to establish the market share thresholds at which its restrictions become applicable, and to define the small and medium establishments to which it does not apply.
This year, two Cabinet Decisions have been issued, which provide much needed guidance on these outstanding aspects: Cabinet Decision No. 13/2016 (the “Ratios Decision”) in respect of market share thresholds and Cabinet Decision No. 22/2016 (the “SME Decision”) in respect of small and medium establishments. The uncertainty that remains at this stage relates to how the Competition Law will be applied and enforced by the Ministry as a matter of practice.
In this inBrief we highlight the main functions of the Competition Law and how the Ratios Decision and SME Decision have added clarity.
The Cartel Restriction
The Competition Law prohibits agreements between entities whose subject or aim is violating, reducing or preventing competition, specifically including price-fixing, market-sharing and bid-collusion agreements, among others. Price-fixing and market-sharing, considered the most egregious of all anti-competitive behaviours by many jurisdictions, are always prohibited, but other restrictive practices may be acceptable if they are ‘weak agreements’, meaning that they are entered into by parties with a combined market share below a certain threshold. The Ratios Decision provides that this threshold, below which such agreements do not raise concerns, is set at 10% of the concerned market.
The Dominant Position Restriction
Although the Competition Law prohibits entities holding a dominant position from taking certain actions, such as imposing resale prices on retailers, price discrimination or artificially cutting prices to force competitors out of the market, it does not specify which entities are regarded as dominant. The Ratios Decision confirms that an entity is considered dominant when its share of the concerned market exceeds 40%.
Exemptions
All is not lost for entities which, although they exceed the relevant thresholds, wish to enter into restrictive agreements or carry out prohibited activities. An application may be made to the Ministry for exemption from the cartel or dominant position restriction, requiring submission of an application with supporting documents and an explanation as to why exemption is required, among others. It is as yet unclear how generous the Ministry will be, and for what reasons, in granting such exemptions.
Merger Clearance
Finally, the Competition Law provides that clearance from the Ministry is required in advance of any merger, acquisition or other consolidation of two or more entities, such as would create an entity with a market share above a certain threshold, and which may affect competition in that market. Although the Competition Law provides that clearance is “particularly” required when a dominant position is being created, it states that merger control does not apply solely in such circumstances. The Ratios Decision set the threshold at 40% of the concerned market, the same level at which a dominant position is stated to exist.
Concerned Market
In each case – cartels, monopolies and mergers – the Ratios Decision sets the relevant threshold as a percentage of the ‘concerned market’. This is defined broadly to comprise markets in which commodities or services are replaceable or may be substituted to meet specific needs, according to price, properties and use.
Whilst it is difficult to define the relevant market in legislation and, oftentimes, markets are only identifiable on a case-by-case basis, the effect of the Ratios Decision is to prevent entities from easily identifying themselves as restricted by the Competition Law – for example, would the relevant market be ‘luxury cars’ or ‘Lamborghinis’? It would be helpful for the Ministry of Economy to issue guidance as to how widely or narrowly it intends to apply the definition of ‘concerned market’ in practice. The practice in the UAE will undoubtedly be driven by how pro-actively the Ministry chooses to enforce the Competition Law, which remains an open issue.
Small and Medium Establishments
In addition to the thresholds provided in respect of the individual restrictions, the Competition Law in its entirety is stated not to apply to ‘small and medium establishments’. The SME Decision defines what such term means, such definition varying depending on whether the relevant entity operates in the trade, industry or services sector. Unlike the definition of concerned market, small and medium establishments are identifiable by turnover and number of employees, thus providing comfort to such entities that they are excluded.
Implications
The Ratios and SME Decisions have provided welcome clarity as to the application of the Competition Law. The Ministry has sufficient guidance to begin actively enforcing. Companies entering into transactions that are arguably within the specified thresholds should seriously consider the Competition Law and whether they need to file for merger clearance or an exemption. With significant consequences for breach – criminal sanctions and fines up to AED 5 million, or 5% of the relevant entity’s turnover – it will be important to keep a close eye on any enforcement actions taken by the Ministry that may give a signal to the market. ■
The future of owner’s rights; a JOP Declaration is one of the most document that protects an owner’s rights.
A developing destination for international business. An overview of the legal and infrastructure developments that are turning Dubai and Abu Dhabi into a leading cross-border business hub.
