James Bowden, Partner at Afridi and Angell, explains the new highlights surrounding the new UAE commercial companies law.
Author: afridi-angell
Do I need a DIFC will?
The Wills and Probate Registry in the Dubai International Financial Centre (the “Registry”) opened in late April of this year. It is now possible to register a will in Dubai, and to have a high degree of confidence that it will be enforced in accordance with its terms. Prior to the establishment of the Registry, it hadn’t been possible to be so confident that foreign wills would be enforced in the United Arab Emirates. There were concerns that Shari’a law would be applied to the estates of non-Muslims, particularly with respect to real property (land and buildings).
In summary therefore, the establishment of the Registry is a welcome initiative, and if you have assets in Dubai then you should almost certainly register a will with the Registry.
A few points to note right from the beginning: firstly, only non-Muslims may lodge their wills with the Registry. At the time of registering the will the testator (the person making the will) must confirm that they are not a Muslim, nor have ever been a Muslim. If this confirmation is later proved to be inaccurate then the will becomes void. Secondly, testators must be at least 22 years old. Thirdly, the will can only relate to assets in the Emirate of Dubai. Finally, the value of the Dubai assets must be balanced with the costs of using the Registry. There are a number of fees payable, some reasonably significant for many people. (The cost of registering a will is currently AED 10,000.)
Prior to the introduction of the Registry, a multitude of approaches were taken in respect to estate planning by Dubai residents. Many people, of various faiths, made no will at all. For those people who were aware of the applicable inheritance and intestacy rules, this was (and continues to be) a perfectly sensible choice. If your family structure is straightforward, and you understand and are comfortable with how your assets will be distributed where there is no will, then there is no reason to make one.
Historically, a variety of solutions were offered to those people who were not sure how their assets would be treated if there was no will, and who wished to create one. Some were told that it was necessary to register a Dubai will with a local notary. Others were told to make a will in their home country, have it translated into Arabic, and then registered locally. Others were told that it was sufficient to sign the will and have it witnessed by a staff member at their home country consulate in Dubai. In short, there was no consensus as to the most appropriate method of creating a will in the UAE, or of ensuring that it would be enforced in accordance with its terms.
The DIFC Registry seeks to resolve these concerns. Wills are reviewed by Registry staff prior to being accepted for registration. This review is anticipated to prevent the registration of wills with blatantly unacceptable terms (ie “. . . and finally, I leave the balance of my estate for the funding of international terrorism, and general crimes against the state”). More significantly, the review ensures that the will formalities are properly attended to (that the will is correctly witnessed, and so forth).
Once registered, the intention is that the terms of the will can be given effect to by the DIFC Court if necessary. Decisions of the DIFC Court must, as a matter of UAE law, be enforced by the Dubai Courts. It is then anticipated that other relevant Dubai governmental entities (such as the Economic Department in respect of assets such as company shares, or the Lands Department in respect of real property) would automatically abide by orders issued by the Dubai Courts (or even by the DIFC Court directly).
This process appears robust, but a small note of caution must be sounded. This is a new, and so far untested, system. It remains to be seen whether the relevant government departments will indeed recognize DIFC wills. We anticipate that this point will be resolved relatively soon, as there appears to be a significant number of individuals eager to make use of the Registry. Furthermore, we have no reason to believe that the system will not work as it should. On that basis, we welcome this beneficial addition to the legal landscape of the Emirate of Dubai. ■
* * * * *
Afridi & Angell can assist with the drafting and registration of DIFC wills. Please contact Stuart Walker if you wish to arrange an appointment to discuss any of the issues mentioned in this note.
DFSA imposes record fine on Deutsche Bank
At the end of March 2015 the Dubai Financial Services Authority (the “DFSA”) imposed its largest fine to date on Deutsche Bank AG Dubai (DIFC Branch) (“Deutsche Bank”). The size of the fine, US$10.5 million, is perhaps modest when compared to the recent GBP 126 million (US$189 million) fine handed to Bank of New York Mellon by the UK regulator, but it is significant in the context of the DIFC, particularly when you appreciate that Deutsche Bank is one of the larger and more important financial institutions in the Centre. The fine sends a clear signal that the DFSA is both independent, and unafraid of taking on sophisticated and well-resourced opponents.
The fine is also a reminder that a cover up can often be worse than the initial crime. Sources close to the DFSA have confirmed that the regulator is unlikely to have taken any formal action against Deutsche Bank if the bank had disclosed its initial breach in a timely manner. As is made very clear in the Decision Notice published on the DFSA website, the bulk of the fine is based upon the fact that Deutsche Bank not only failed to cooperate with the DFSA investigation, but also actively mislead the DFSA and provided false information to the regulator.
During a three-year period beginning in January 2011, Deutsche Bank operated in a manner that was contrary to certain provisions of the DFSA Rulebook. The bank’s private wealth management team in the DIFC was providing some advisory services to high-net-worth individuals without documenting these individuals as clients of the DIFC branch. In summary, Deutsche Bank is authorized by the DFSA to provide the financial services of, amongst others, arranging and advising. This was the case during the relevant period, and continues to date. Also, there is no suggestion that the advisory services provided were anything other than competent and professional. The investigation found that there was no evidence of financial detriment to the bank’s clients. Furthermore, this does not seem to be a case of rogue individuals inside the bank improperly chasing bonuses or commissions.
The only thing Deutsche Bank did wrong (at least initially) was to fail to document high-net-worth individuals as clients of the DIFC branch. The business model that the bank was meant to be following was for the individuals to be referred by the DIFC branch to other parts of the Deutsche Bank group (including but not limited to branches in Geneva and Luxembourg). This was being done (and the clients properly documented in those booking centres) but the DIFC private wealth management team continued to be in touch with the clients, and therefore provided the previously mentioned advisory services. If they had simply issued a DIFC client agreement, and complied with the standard DIFC KYC and AML procedures, all would have been well. Unfortunately, this did not happen, and the DFSA became aware that Deutsche Bank might have been uncompliant in these areas.
It was at this point that the senior management within Deutsche Bank made some startling errors of judgment. Amongst other things, false and misleading emails and letters were sent to the DFSA by the bank’s compliance team. Internal reports about possible breaches of the DFSA Rulebook were suppressed. Bank employees were encouraged to amend internal reports to remove references to regulatory breaches. The bank then refused to comply with a DFSA notice requiring the production of various documents. This then compelled the DFSA to seek a DIFC court order to enforce the notice.
The DFSA’s investigation into the breaches at Deutsche Bank took two-and-a-half years to resolve. The final six months were apparently spent negotiating the wording of the published Decision Notice. The bank obtained a 20 percent discount on the total amount of the fine by agreeing not to appeal or otherwise contest the fine. Unlike many of the other notices or undertakings published by the regulator in other matters, no specific names are mentioned in the Deutsche Bank notice. The blushes of the relevant people at Deutsche Bank have therefore been spared. Nonetheless, this must have been an embarrassing episode for the bank, and something of a success for the DFSA. ■
UAE Competition Law – All bark and no bite?, India Business Law Journal
James Bowden and Abdus Samad reveal everything you need to know about the UAE competition law.
Hotel Reforms in Dubai: Setting the stage for 2020, India Business Law Journal
While Dubai is already home to numerous hotels, the Dubai Department of Tourism and Commerce Marketing (DTCM) estimates approximately 45,000 new hotel rooms will need to be constructed by 2020. With foreign hotel project investors and operators seeking to capitalize on the numerous opportunities, an overview of the legal aspects concerning hotels within the emirate of Dubai is provided in this publication.
Making Monetary Sense: Understand Your VC Term Sheet, Entrepreneur Middle East
During the course of startup maturation, founders seek financing alternatives outside of banking, family, and friends. As a result, venture capital funding has been on the rise in the Middle East as trips in this region pursue greater and more sophisticated sources of capital, with Dubai thus far serving as the funding epicenter. This publication reveals everything you need to know.
Minority Shareholder Protections in the UAE, India Business Law Journal
James Bowden reveals everything you need to know about shareholders protections in the UAE.
Free zones in the UAE – an overview
Strategically located between Europe, Africa and Asia, the United Arab Emirates (the “UAE”) has become a hub for trade and commerce throughout the world. In order to further encourage foreign investment, more than 20 free zones have been established across Dubai and focus on a wide range of business sectors, ranging from manufacturing to technology. Free zones offer a number of advantages to foreign businesses, including zero taxation, repatriation of profits and 100% foreign ownership. It is important to note that each free zone has its own bureaucracy along with unique regulations and costs. We are often asked by our clients which free zone they should incorporate in, and the following provides a brief overview of several free zones located in Dubai, and identifies a number of factors a potential investor may wish to consider when making their choice. The factors that drive the selection of a free zone tend to relate to the nature of the business to be carried on, cost of formation, administrative ease or difficulty, and location.
Established in 1985, Jebel Ali (“JAFZA”) is the oldest free zone in the UAE. JAFZA has one of the world’s largest shipping container ports, and is home to many industrial and trading companies utilizing the port. JAFZA recently revised its capital requirements for onshore companies and instead of requiring minimum capital deposits ranging from AED 500,000 – AED 1,000,000, JAFZA will determine the required capital on a case-by-case basis. Generally the minimum capital requirement is equal to the first year operating expenses as estimated by the JAFZA sales team. Office space is required for the formation of an onshore company and the lease or purchase thereof is often one of the largest expenses associated with the establishment of the company.
JAFZA is currently in the process of opening a new business complex named JAFZA One, which will provide companies seeking to incorporate in JAFZA with so-called “virtual office” options, which are far more affordable. JAFZA also allows for the formation of offshore companies, which have no physical presence in the UAE and accordingly do not lease space, but instead require the appointment of a Registered Agent. A Registered Agent provides a mailing address for service in the UAE and may also provide minimal administrative functions for the offshore company, and has no ownership or management interest. The minimum capital requirement for offshore companies is AED 1 and only one class of shares is permitted. Offshore companies can open current accounts with certain banks in the UAE, but cannot carry on active businesses and as such cannot sponsor UAE residency visas. JAFZA offshore companies are typically used by non-nationals as holding companies.
The Dubai International Financial Centre (the “DIFC”) is a financial services free zone based on common law principles. Established in Dubai’s financial district in 2004, the DIFC was created to attract international financial firms with the objective of elevating Dubai’s position as a global hub with access to the emerging markets of the Middle East, Africa and South Asia.
Formation, licensing and other fees are generally higher in the DIFC but it provides a level of regulation and international credibility not found in other free zones. The Dubai Financial Services Authority (the “DFSA”) regulates financial services companies to a standard comparable to western financial regulators, and all DIFC entities are subject to privacy and data protection regulations in line with international standards. The DIFC also offers its own judicial system based on common law, and apart from hearing matters specifically related to DIFC companies, the DIFC Courts can also hear civil or commercial actions from outside the DIFC (including outside the UAE) if the parties have contractually agreed. Given the relatively high cost and administrative effort of establishing a DIFC entity, this free zone is generally chosen for specific business purposes rather than simply achieving 100 percent foreign ownership. Dubai Silicon Oasis (“DSO”) is a free zone focusing on technology-based industries, with specific incentives aimed at entrepreneurs and start-ups. While being located outside of the city centre, DSO provides access to a strong network of technology-focused venture capitalists as well as providing incubation inducements. Formation and licensing fees are competitive at DSO and office space is required with a minimum annual rent of AED 85,000.
The Dubai Airport Free Zone (“DAFZA”) offers a strategic advantage to freight and logistics companies as it is attached to Terminal 2 of the Dubai International Airport. DAFZA offers a variety of options for space, ranging from part-time desks to insulated industrial units. Formation and licensing fees are slightly higher than other free zones, but the required minimum share capital is competitive at AED 1,000. DAFZA’s administration is relatively easy to deal with.
Dubai Multi-Commodities Centre (“DMCC”) was created in 2002 to enhance commodity trade flow through the emirate. Dubai is among the top three trading hubs in the world for gold, tea and diamonds. DMCC is popular in part because it is centrally located in a popular district of Dubai with relatively attractive office premises available. DMCC is an attractive free zone for numerous industries in addition to commodities traders, including recruitment, information technology and advertising. Formation, licensing and office rental fees are higher than average, owing to DMCC’s desirable location.
Dubai World Central (“DWC”) is one of the newest free zones in the UAE and formation and licensing fees are competitive. Located between JAFZA and Al Maktoum International Airport (removed from the conventional Dubai city limits), DWC focuses on the aviation industry, including related logistics, commercial and residential projects and light industry in general, although other business categories are welcome as well. It is too soon to tell whether DWC will be a popular free zone, as it is undergoing constant administrative change and unpredictability of service while it matures.
Free zones are not unique to Dubai, and other emirates including Abu Dhabi, Ras Al Khaimah and Sharjah offer attractive options for foreign businesses. These free zones offer some competitive advantages compared to Dubai’s free zones, such as lower licensing fees and office rental costs. It should be noted that setting up a company in these emirates can create logistical hurdles. A company registered in a free zone outside of Dubai cannot lease space, sponsor Dubai visas or operate in Dubai. When the primary purpose of incorporation is attaining a UAE residency visa, forming a company in these free zones may be the most expeditious option.
While the UAE’s free zones offer many attractive features for investors, it is important to be aware that free zone companies are not permitted to carry on business outside of the physical boundaries of the relevant free zone. For businesses that intend to service or supply the Dubai market, a free zone company may not be an appropriate vehicle depending on the nature of the business, so it is critical to consider this carefully prior to incorporation. ■
Hedge Funds (UAE chapter), 2nd edition, European Lawyer Reference
Stuart Walker, Partner, and Ronnie Dabassi (former Afridi & Angell Associate) provide a comprehensive overview of hedge funds in relation to the United Arab Emirates.
UAE Competition Law – All bark and no bite?
Federal Law No. 4 of 2012 on the regulation of competition (the “Competition Law”) introduced a regime for the regulation of anti-competitive behavior in the UAE which previously did not exist. If implemented strictly its effects would be very significant on UAE business. The Competition Law came into force on 23 February 2013 and introduces merger/acquisition clearance requirements, prohibitions against anti-competitive agreements and activities which constitute abuse of a dominant position, as well as some anti-competitive trade practices. The six month transition period allowing entities to become compliant with the Competition Law expired on 23 August 2013.
To date, the Competition Law has not been enforced in practice even moderately. One reason for this is that the Competition Law left key details to be set out in regulations that were to follow. The anticipated regulations have recently been issued but, disappointingly, they do not provide the clarity that was needed. Nonetheless, compliance with the Competition Law is (ostensibly) mandatory as it is a current, valid UAE law. With the recent issuance of the regulations it is foreseeable that this law could start to enjoy some level of enforcement. It is worth noting that, while the newly issued regulations do not provide a great deal of clarity on some key points under the Competition Law, they do set out a mechanism for making complaints against parties allegedly in breach of the Competition Law and the Ministry of Economy’s duty to investigate once a complaint is accepted.
Scope of Application
The Competition Law applies to all entities undertaking commercial activities in the UAE and to entities operating outside the UAE but whose activities affect competition inside the UAE.
Certain types of entities and industry sectors are expressly exempted. These include:
- federal and local government entities and entities owned or controlled by federal or emirate governments;
- small and medium size entities (not defined in the Competition Law or the regulations); and
- entities operating in telecoms; financial services; pharmaceutical production and distribution; cultural activities; oil and gas; postal services including express delivery; electricity and water production and distribution; sewage and waste disposal; transportation and railway.
Prohibitions
The Competition Law requires that entities seek merger clearance from the UAE Ministry of Economy if they are contemplating a transaction that:
- will result in the acquisition of a direct or indirect, total or partial interest or benefit in assets, equity, and/or obligations of another entity to which the Competition Law applies;
- will create or promote a dominant position; and/or
- may affect the level of competition in the relevant market.
In addition, the Competition Law prohibits entities from entering into agreements or arrangements (these terms should be construed very broadly) the aim, object or effect of which is to restrict competition. This includes, amongst other things, agreements or arrangements which directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices, grant exclusivity with respect to products or geography or other market division (other than through registered commercial agencies), and agreements or arrangements which involve collusion in bids and tenders. These restrictions would impact many distribution agreements in the UAE.
The Competition Law provides for potentially far-reaching penalties in the event of violation. These penalties include:
- fines of between AED 500,000 and AED 5 million for entering into restrictive agreements or abusing market dominance; and
- fines of between 2% to 5% of the infringing entity’s annual revenue derived from the sale of the relevant goods and services in the UAE for a failure to notify a transaction which is required to be notified pursuant to the Competition Law.
In addition, an entity violating the provisions of the Competition Law exposes itself to possible criminal sanctions.
Exemptions
The Competition Law allows for entities to seek an exemption to the Competition Law from the UAE Ministry of Economy. The procedure for seeking such an exemption is set out in the regulations to the Competition Law. It involves a written application seeking an exemption for a transaction. The entity seeking the exemption must provide copies of its constitutive documents and financial statements (for the last two financial years). In addition, it must submit an economic rationale for the transaction and its reasons for requesting the exemption. All documents submitted must be in Arabic, but may be accompanied by an English translation. The Ministry of Economy must respond to such a request within 90 days, but may extend this period by a further 45 days. In the event that no response is received within this time frame, approval is deemed to have been given.
Implications
Compliance with the Competition Law is now mandatory. Accordingly, businesses must consider the effect of the Competition law on their business. It remains to be seen how the UAE Ministry of Economy will interpret or enforce the Competition Law or the implementing regulations. As a minimum, the Competition Law and its potential effects need to be considered by any business operating commercially in the UAE or which intend to acquire a UAE business. ■